![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
empallinthis this was sparked by the micheal jackson episode of south park so be warned. i am sure some one is going to geet offeded but this is just some questions i have that i will probably never have a suitable answer to. i do not intend for this to be funny. these are just questions that are stuck in my head that i though i would throw out.
every once in a while a celebrity gets busted and it comes on the news that they were found to be in possesion of kiddie porn. that alone is such a broad term that they really should explain it better to put it in context. i personnally would like to know if said sick fuck has pictures of little kids forced to do things they should have no idea about of if it is a porn movie that happens to have a 17 year old in it that knows all to well what he or she is doing. say what you will but there is a diference there. or is it just stories? if that is the case you could find that sort of thing in books by steven king, charles bukowski, and a whole host of well respected authors. its all about context. no its is all about shock value. or is it something found in the cache files on their computer(s)? you can find all kinds of shit in there in most peoples computers. you can thank the miricale of pop-ups for that.
so these leads to another set of situations. suppose you have naked pictures of yourself as a child and decide to post them online somewhere. is that considered child pornograhy? i honestly dont know why someone whould torture themselves like this but people do some weird shit.
suppose you are one of those parents that take said type of pictures (which is most parents really) is is kiddie porn if you post those to a website or email them to family members? at what point does it go from being a cute baby picture to spank material for some twisted fuck? at the point that you take the picture? when you get it developed? when you decide to share it?
i cant help but be curious if pedophiles spank it to images of them selves when they were younger. if you can answer this from experience please go away. now. but i am curious. but this one isn't going to kill this cat.
ok now on that note have a nice day.
every once in a while a celebrity gets busted and it comes on the news that they were found to be in possesion of kiddie porn. that alone is such a broad term that they really should explain it better to put it in context. i personnally would like to know if said sick fuck has pictures of little kids forced to do things they should have no idea about of if it is a porn movie that happens to have a 17 year old in it that knows all to well what he or she is doing. say what you will but there is a diference there. or is it just stories? if that is the case you could find that sort of thing in books by steven king, charles bukowski, and a whole host of well respected authors. its all about context. no its is all about shock value. or is it something found in the cache files on their computer(s)? you can find all kinds of shit in there in most peoples computers. you can thank the miricale of pop-ups for that.
so these leads to another set of situations. suppose you have naked pictures of yourself as a child and decide to post them online somewhere. is that considered child pornograhy? i honestly dont know why someone whould torture themselves like this but people do some weird shit.
suppose you are one of those parents that take said type of pictures (which is most parents really) is is kiddie porn if you post those to a website or email them to family members? at what point does it go from being a cute baby picture to spank material for some twisted fuck? at the point that you take the picture? when you get it developed? when you decide to share it?
i cant help but be curious if pedophiles spank it to images of them selves when they were younger. if you can answer this from experience please go away. now. but i am curious. but this one isn't going to kill this cat.
ok now on that note have a nice day.
